![]() if so, will that result in a new request to Just curious though, the offscreen tabs, will that work by rendering the I'm really glad you (or someone) will be able to look at this. Might want to lean on the renderer to do fancy things that aren'tĪbility to screenshot whole tab, not just visible. Since I think this is a useful thing for Chrome Apps that If nobody else takes it, I might have some cycles in ~late 2014 to Its scope is narrowed to initially just support this particular use case. ![]() Maybe it will have an easier time sticking if Have satisfied the request with minor tweaks. The offscreen tabs experiment mentioned in comment #28 would probably Image available to JS is a bit fiddly using this workflow. Won't be pixel-aware and will look pretty crappy. This flow to not really satisfy this feature request, IMO. The image to anything other than the full page size.īut rendering to print, and rendering to screen are different enough for In either case, you probably want a custom page size that's ~2+ metres On Mac, you can just choose 'Open in Preview' in the print dialog, then I think they areĭifferent, otherwise the feature essentially exists already. This is probably a good way to look at the problem. > ".how are the requirements for this feature different from printing the To screenshot whole tab, not just visible section Willing to help out coming up with the "perfect" solution later. If you can get that working, then I think everyone will be happy, and Todo this, as otherwise Paparazzi, webkit2png, wkhtmltopdf, and general Known, otherwise we won't have scroll bars).Ĭ(null,, function(url)Īs to the underlying WebKit/Blink engine. where its hopefully as simple as telling the rendering engine toĬreate a paint rectangle the size of the page (where I know the size is We just want the ability to screenshot the whole page (without scrollīars). or getUserMedia / offscreenTabs, which are equally wrong). Please avoid creating an entirely new API (pageCapture which is really for So please don't waste your time coming up with the "perfect" solution, and This list also excludes ChromeDriver, which really limits the ability for Here is a list of some extensions which face this problem. ![]() So far the only work-arounds I can see include:ġ) JavaScript scrolling and stitching, which the official Google ScreenĬapture extension uses (and still has issues).Ģ) Sending the page to a remote server to render (I hate to think how bigģ) The use of NPAPI, which is even worse. Is anyone able to look at this? As its effecting at least 10 extensions,Īnd 3,800,393 users (unfortunately my C/C++ programming experience is not Work priorities will consistently be examined, reassessed, and adjusted with the aim of improving our users productivity.Ability to screenshot whole tab, not just visible section PowerToys is a rapid-incubation, open source team aimed at providing power users ways to squeeze more efficiency out of the Windows shell and customize it for individual workflows. An overview of the original PowerToys can be found here: Using Windows 95 PowerToys. Inspired by the Windows 95 era PowerToys project, this reboot provides power users with ways to squeeze more efficiency out of the Windows shell and customize it for individual workflows. For reference, you can also find the Release checklist on the PowerToys wiki. ![]() PowerToys release notes are listed on the install page of the GitHub repo. The PowerToys team will be happy to work with you to figure out the best approach, provide guidance and mentorship throughout feature development, and help avoid any wasted or duplicate effort. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |